Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Signs State's Marriage Equality Bill
CNN ^ | June 24, 2011

Posted on 06/24/2011 9:44:47 PM PDT by Steelfish

CNN Ticker Tag only NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Signs State's Marriage Equality Bill. Same-sex couples will now be able to marry within 30 days.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: cino; cuomo; gayisgreat; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; improud; marriage; marriageoflove; moralabsolutes; ny; yay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last
To: Steelfish

I remember how the bishop of Albany cheered Cuomo from the pulpit and announced that Cuomo would be implementing policies in harmony with the Church.

I’ve always said that a good portion of American bishops are knowingly or unknowingly working for the enemy.

I have no doubt that the Most Reverend Mr. Hubbard is quietly celebrating this development with a nice drink and maybe a cigar.


21 posted on 06/24/2011 10:13:28 PM PDT by jtal (Runnin' a World in Need with White Folks' Greed - since 1492)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
So, why couldn’t they put this crap up for a popular vote?

Because the New York state constitution does not provide for votes of the people. That idea became popular later in American history, after the NY constitution was written. It's why mostly just the western and other younger states have initiatives and referendums allowed by their constitutions.
22 posted on 06/24/2011 10:13:42 PM PDT by LonelyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: preamble

And from the Wall St. J. just see who gave us this legalized sodomy:

“The Republican-led Senate in New York voted to legalize same-sex marriage, delivering to gay-rights advocates a hard-fought victory that they hope will tip the balance in the country toward their cause.”


23 posted on 06/24/2011 10:19:21 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon
Because the New York state constitution does not provide for votes of the people.

A New York Initiative and Referendum Amendment may appear on the November 5, 2013 state ballot in New York as an legislatively-referred constitutional amendment. The proposed amendment would allow for voters to enact and amend laws through initiative and referendum.

If it passes, they could then petition for repeal of gay marriage to be put on the next state ballot. 5% of the previous gubernatorial electorate is needed ...

If the repeal is passed in the election - then the current gay marriage law is null and void ...

This just happened recently in Maine ... pro-gay marriage legislation was passed and signed into law. 6 months later it was rejected by referendum in the next election.

24 posted on 06/24/2011 10:25:06 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: cherry

Hypothetical:

So Mr.Gay, you feel “normal” now like a male and female in matrimony?


25 posted on 06/24/2011 10:26:11 PM PDT by Para-Ord.45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

“If I wanted to marry a male friend ( I’m a male) with no sex involved, I could do it in NY and the other states that have passed similar laws.”

Of course, gay people have done this for centuries. Now you have equal rights.


26 posted on 06/24/2011 10:33:06 PM PDT by Kahonek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Next up: Polygamy. Guaranteed within 10 years the islamists will have forced the dems and RINOS to legalize polygamy.


27 posted on 06/24/2011 10:44:17 PM PDT by Adams (Fight on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanLM

Gay marriage is not, at present, a pathway to citizenship unlike for heterosexuals. There are several deportation and immigration cases underway even with the Holder DOJ. I’m sure it’s just a matter of time particularly if SCOTUS upholds the lower court ruling against traditional marriage in CA and if DOMA is ended.


28 posted on 06/24/2011 10:52:03 PM PDT by newzjunkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Time for Cuomo to be excommunicated...


29 posted on 06/24/2011 11:03:05 PM PDT by Fred (The only job Obama is trying to save is his own)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fred

UFA!!!!


30 posted on 06/24/2011 11:04:47 PM PDT by Jan Hus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Fred

ABSOLUTELY YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


31 posted on 06/24/2011 11:09:53 PM PDT by Steelfish (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Does the ‘marriage’ have to be recognized in other States?


32 posted on 06/24/2011 11:42:36 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

It never passes popular vote, it even loses in Calif.


33 posted on 06/24/2011 11:43:34 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Never happen.


34 posted on 06/24/2011 11:44:46 PM PDT by fortheDeclaration (When the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn (Pr.29:2))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

It’s the slippery slope. Soon the gays will be demanding polygamy. They will say that the prohibition against polygamy and polyandry is for heterosexuals where children are involved.


35 posted on 06/24/2011 11:49:03 PM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LonelyCon

While it is not illegal, how common is it for a NY governor to legislate a bill? Don’t law makers usually do that?

“Governor Cuomo Proposes Marriage Equality Act”

http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/06142011MarriageEqualityAct


36 posted on 06/24/2011 11:52:26 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Hardly the end of the world.

Mostly they just bought in to large divorce fees a year or two hence. Cgrts.


37 posted on 06/24/2011 11:53:07 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Well the NY Republicans have did it now. Kick the ones that voted for this out. Not only does it show that they are not very intelligent to buy into the “Marriage Equality” crap. I had thought there was a good chance that this would be put off instead two critical votes caved to the liberals. The good news is this can be changed but the bad news it will take even more work than in Iowa where I’m certain that we are going to succeed in reversing it there. I’m glad that groups like NOM are getting better and better at going on the offensive the problem is the core of the gay rights fiction and its big govt orwellian goals has to be hit over and over again. Also the idea that someone can be “born gay” has to be destoryed in much the same way the idea of AGW has been destoryed in the minds of everyone but those in the political, media, and academic classes.

The problem with these big fictions under the guise of liberty is granted by govt rather than a function of the absence of govt. Homosexual marriage was not banned in NY. It simply was not licensed in NY by the state govt. There is just so much wrong with the juvenile unreasoned ideas and propaganda that has led to this type of thing.

People think they can hide from or ignore these social issues because it makes them uncomfortable or they want to be hip but it is exactly these issues that will allow the govt to eventually censor even the free exercise of your conscience.


38 posted on 06/25/2011 12:09:50 AM PDT by Maelstorm (Better to keep your enemy in your sights than in your camp expecting him to guard your back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanLM
I hate my state. On to your commnet - Of freaking course ! This ain't no I now pronounce you chuck and larry scenario. Imagine if my brother is unemployed now and needs a life saving operation and such. why can't I marry him and get him on my insurance plan ? Or better yet, my beautiful St. Bernard Sasha is gonna need an amputation and a lifetime of therapy and drug products. How bout I make her my better half to get her on my plan. This is totally AFU for so many reasons. Not the LEAST of which is the fact that it's just wrong. and here is Sasha. Sasha
39 posted on 06/25/2011 12:09:50 AM PDT by onona (I stand with SARAH !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

That was just four Republicans and all the Democrats.

The NY Senate is narrowly majority Republican but most of the Republicans voted No.

You are buying the “Republicans did it” and “bipartisan” spin. This is meant to demoralize potential Republican voters.


40 posted on 06/25/2011 12:31:12 AM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson