“Considering the VAST majority of Domestic Violence is committed by women, and considering the police would have been all over the husband anyway (that’s the way it’s done), there is no reason to come to the conclusion that the husband did anything.”
Wrong.
Maybe it was committed by a woman in the one case you know about, but beating up your partner is definitely a male dominated pursuit.
Sorry you’ve fallen for a liberal lie. The VAST majority of domestic violence is committed by women, as well as child abuse. There is study after study to confirm it. As a matter of fact 2/3’s of women in “battered” women’s shelter admit they lied to get the free support. The founder/inventor of women’s shelters also said she regretted ever creating them, because they have just become a tool for women to leave their spouses easily and get free stuff (to paraphrase).
You either have no idea what you’re talking about, or are pushing the feminists agenda. In either event, I don’t need to hash this out with you, just like global warming, and other liberal religions, the women and children line has gotten old and tired, and has no basis in fact.
And by the way, if someone is arrested by police after an “assault” they are not considered injured in a domestic violence case. Yet, half of the cases in according to the DOJ’s statistics have males as the victims. Meaning, that despite all of the liberal shop talk of male being the “abusers” and that the vast majority of incarcerated in a domestic dispute are males (and don’t get counted), still they somehow make up half of the victim’s injuries. Educate yourself. If one partner is injured, 2/3 of the time, it’s a male injured, by the hand of a female, who are also, 4x more likely to use a weapon to compensate for their natural lack of strength. Defenseless, I think not.