Hey, New York Slimes! Here at FR we are on to all the slime you choose to propagate.
in the tab
This writer is confirming what many of us fear. Namely, that monogamous homosexual marriage is just a way station on the way to fulfilling another agenda.
Some gays activists have said that the goal is to force monogamous marriage on society. Then, having established the concept of homosexual marriage, they can move on from there to “polyamory”, “polygamy”, or groups of people of any gender living together as family units. Once they demolish the concept of monogamous opposite sex marriage, then it will pave the way for any other type of relationship having to be legally recognized. Eventually there will be lawsuits to force recognition of groups of people living together on the same legal basis as marriage.
Note how she laments that in Massachusetts, the norm of monogamy hasn’t been lifted yet?????
They’re so bold these days, it just baffles the mind. They’re out to destroy our society, and they as much as say so in public. I really hope this latest offensive backfires massively.
They want the "right" to be married but they don't actually want to BE married, all of those unmarried "partnerships" will no longer be eligible for employer benefits.
They want the "right" to be married but they don't actually want to BE married, all of those unmarried "partnerships" will no longer be eligible for employer benefits.
FMCDH(BITS)
Will be a billion plus legal industry. Can’t wait for the palimony suits to start hitting in California.
They also want to target churches. Any church refusing to do a ‘gay marriage’ can lose its tax exempt status. NEVER hear this mentioned.
Scientifically, none of the studies has been reproducible.
The 1993 Hamer study Cherry Picked the Data. Did not have a control group and did not check on the brothers of Gay men in the study (an obvious data point)
The 1991 Gay Twin study by Michael Bailey and Richard Pillard also excluded checks on any brothers. The theory that gay twins were 100% gay turned out to be false.
The “Hypothalamus Study,” conducted in 1991 by Dr. Simon LeVay was supposedly based on the idea that cadavers of 19 men of which only 6 he knew the sexual proclivities. The sample was too small, had questionable conclusions and has not been reproducable.
In logical fact, a gay gene would exclude itself from the human genome according to natural selection theories. Gays with the gene would not reproduce and therefore the majority would not pass on any theoretical gene.
No, the "Gay Gene" theory is Bunkus and so is the rush to make Gay Marriage the law of the country. The big result of such would be the end of free speech. Just ask any Orthodox Priest or Pastor in Canada.
Bookmarked... thank you for digging this article out of the sewer.
You can call it what you want.....
.....But it will never be MARRIAGE.
History defines it, you might be able to get lawyers to make a technical rule that it means what you want it to mean, but you can't change the meaning for real. The real, substantial, and historical meaning is a "union between a man and a woman".
Gays and liberals to destroy western life.................lawyers, well divorce is profit for them.