Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: svcw
Most here haven't heard the recording or they wouldn't be so quick to condem the police. Unless they are blatantly ignoring what was said.

We don't know what SHE said to the Police BEFORE she started taping. It wasn't "Have a nice day" or the police wouldn't have said, "Your comment concerns me and I'm not comfortable having you stand behind me".

She was looking for trouble. And found it!

24 posted on 06/23/2011 8:54:58 AM PDT by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: muleskinner
We don't know what if SHE said to the Police BEFORE she started taping

Fixed that for you. It is only from the implication made by the cop that we infer she said anything.

The other explanation is that cop is trying to contaminate the evidence.

32 posted on 06/23/2011 9:12:16 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Monarchy is the one system of government where power is exercised for the good of all - Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: muleskinner
She was looking for trouble. And found it!

B.S. I looked at the entire tape. It is my belief the cop blatantly lied. There is NO proof this lady was involved with other incidents.

The arrogant attitude of that POS cop was one of an overlord. That arrogant, sadistic, lying cop was clearly abusing a citizen. That arrogant cop should be sued and fired.

LEO is quickly becoming sadistic in its treatment of citizens. The time will come when there will be real blow back. I will boldly be on the side of the citizens.

There is absolutely NO excuse for LEO to be disrespectful to the public.

33 posted on 06/23/2011 9:13:34 AM PDT by sand88 (Sarah Palin announces her run: August 12, 2011 11:10am ET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: muleskinner

I viewed the video that is posted on YouTube, and I find it confirms the woman’s story, and not the police officer’s claims.

None of us, you included, know what she said before rolling tape, but your conclusion about that fact is a non sequitur.


46 posted on 06/23/2011 9:34:37 AM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: muleskinner
We don't know what SHE said to the Police BEFORE she started taping. It wasn't "Have a nice day" or the police wouldn't have said, "Your comment concerns me and I'm not comfortable having you stand behind me".

Quite possibly, she had said absolutely nothing before switching on the recorder, but the "clever" policeman thought that it would make a good "sound bite" to say that anyway!

Regards,

49 posted on 06/23/2011 9:37:27 AM PDT by alexander_busek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: muleskinner

It doesn’t matter what she said.

The First Amendment trumps poor widdle poweece feewings that might get hurt or challenges to what some thug with a badge thinks is his authority.

Cops who do this need to be fired and they, their departments and cities successfully sued. Then maybe this would stop and these JBTs would think twice before harassing the citizenry.


56 posted on 06/23/2011 11:24:17 AM PDT by Emperor Palpatine (Can you afford to board the Chattanooga Choo-Choo?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

To: muleskinner

“She was looking for trouble.”

I saw the woman on CNN over the weekend.

She says that she started filming because she was concerned about racial profiling from LEO’s in Rochester.

I hate to stereotype - but the words coming out of this woman’s mouth sounded like what you’d here from a white inner-city liberal.


66 posted on 06/27/2011 3:21:11 PM PDT by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson