[dennisw]

You have also been ducking my question about the conflict between your support for drug laws based on the New Deal Commerce Clause, and your claim that you support the original Commerce Clause. You can't have it both ways, so which is it?

I am in between both same as I believe Darwin and the sociobiologists (Dawkins) have it half right but God also enters into evolution. Don't act as though you are oblivious to the power of transnational bankers and transnational corporations. What Commerce Clause do you have in mind for them? To restrain them? You have a tunnel vision that only thinks in terms of restraining the Feral Government. Who do you think controls the Federal Government and the Federal Reserve? The most powerful bankers and corporations in the world do

[Ken H]

Don't act as though you are oblivious to the power of transnational bankers and transnational corporations. What Commerce Clause do you have in mind for them? To restrain them?

How about the original Commerce Clause. You know, the part that delegates to Congress the power to regulate foreign commerce. If that is inadequate, then amend the Constitution.

In any event, your claim to support the original Commerce Clause is simply not true, since you support federal laws based on the New Deal Commerce Clause. Can you not admit to this simple truth?