Over 70 years ago, we adopted an expansive view of the Commerce Clause which allowed fedgov to get its foot in the door to control education, health care, the environment and a host of other concerns.
As Clarence Thomas put it in US v Lopez:
I am aware of no cases prior to the New Deal that characterized the power flowing from the Commerce Clause as sweepingly as does our substantial effects test. My review of the case law indicates that the substantial effects test is but an innovation of the 20th century.
Your drug war depends on the New Deal Commerce Clause for its existence. So let me ask a question that prohibitionist almost always duck:
Do you think national marijuana prohibition is in keeping with the original understanding of the Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment... yes or no?
It appears that after you’ve had enough beer to make the New Deal look “great” you have just enough time to post a comment to FR before you pass out.