Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Buddygirl

That is an opinion that isn’t supported by any facts. Perhaps you could explain why a prohibition on alcohol required a constitutional amendment and prohibition of other drugs does not. You could demonstrate your amazing intellectual skills and knowledge in doing so.


153 posted on 06/22/2011 5:20:18 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

Don’t expect an answer. Prohibitionists never bother to recognize their previous failed experiment.

Anyone who claims to be a conservative and favors the Drug War is shallow in the extreme, with little if any regard for either the constitution or individual rights. Common sense doesn’t really register for those people either.


158 posted on 06/22/2011 5:28:26 PM PDT by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

Because people realized that people who want to fulfill their own selfish desires are going to do it (drink alcohol and/or smoke pot), anyhow, anyway. So, they didn’t pass the law to prohibit drugs. That is what YOU and others are, selfish, who support legalization of pot.


160 posted on 06/22/2011 5:31:31 PM PDT by Buddygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson