Posted on 06/22/2011 1:23:14 PM PDT by Second Amendment First
A bipartisan team of Reps. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Texas, will introduce federal legislation that would permit states to legalize, regulate, tax and control marijuana without federal interference.
The legislation will be unveiled Thursday by Frank, an outspoken liberal Democrat, and the libertarian Paul, who is running for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination.
The bill would limit the U.S. government role in marijuana enforcement to interdiction of cross-border or inter-state smuggling. Citizens would be able to legally grow, use or sell cannabis in states which have legalized the forbidden weed.
The legislation is the first bill to be introduced in Congress that would end federal marijuana prohibition.
In a preview of the legislation, the Marijuana Policy Project noted that last week marked the 40th Anniversary of when President Nixon declared that the federal government was at war with marijuana and other drugs.
Nixon had rejected recommendations by a presidential panel that the country move toward decriminalization and an education and treatment-based drug policy.
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.seattlepi.com ...
Wow! Three answers to my 1 post! Couldn’t think straight to answer me in one post! What is wrong, you smoking pot?
Me too! I’m probably more conservativce than most people.I would love to see Sarah run.
It’s not jsut a lucky few dear.Like I said earlier upwards of 85% of people under the age of 60 have smoked before and many of them have never stopped.I wish there was an honest study that did not start out with addicts or crazy people then I would say the results would be accurate.
My hubby and I. Sorry, but I just had to.
Nope, just stating what I have read over the years about the effects of pot smoking. By the way, why don’t you get your head out of the boudoir? That is no place for a gentleman to be, (if you are one)!
I dont know. Ive seen people in college who smoked daily, but when they were sober, they had excellent cognitive abilities. Its the same as people who drink. They act drunk when they are drunk, but all my friends passed their courses. They knew that there was a time to drink and a time to do work, and separated it.
One of my friends smoked every day and finished with an Industrial Engineering Degree in 2 1/2 years and then was accepted into a masters program based on merit.
These are just anecdotal stories, but I have seen people thrive while still throwing down in their offtime.
NO perhaps yu shoud look again those were responses to different numered posts...one which was not to you. Boy some people sure become witches when their preconcided notions are challegned....BTW my IQ is over 140 so no I have no problem thinking.
Helps to proof read sometimes sorry about the battered English....
You preconcieved...typos sorry I do not type well....
I do it all the time on FB. Drives me nuts.
Is selfishness bad?
Or is it just “bad” selfishness when someone wants to do something that doesnt fit into your ethos?
Yes but at least on FB you do have an edit now or you can copy, delete, and then edit to repost....here once you hit post it is too late. I am the queen of thinking faster than I can type,which means sometimes whole parts will be missing, and having at minimum one typo per post....
Funny how some resort to insults when their arguments run thin....just like liberals.I’d like too know how it is selfish when I m am sitting in my own home not bothering anyone? I pay taxes more than most because we never wanted children.Heck I own 3 properties so pay school taxes 3 X....
OOOPPPPSSS to not too
That’s a nice try but you avoided explaining “why” no Constitutional amendment was required to prohibit drugs and yet it was necessary in order to prohibit alcohol. Here is a hint; there was a legal reason for AMENDMENT XVIII. They didn’t go through the arduous and risky means of a Constitutional Convention for fun.
There is one subject they avoid tenaciously. The Constitution and how the rule of law applies to Federal drug laws. That means they are statists not conservatives.
Then how did they get to be illegal? All drugs were legal at the turn of the 20th century.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.