It is not really a question of being nice, but a refusal to be sucked into the game of childish name calling. I referred to the article as containing unsubstantiated nonsense. That was a reference to the content of the article and not a personal comment on the author, or any one else for that matter. The response by editor-surveyor was to attack not the substance of what I said, but me personally. I find such tactics more reflective of children playing in a sand box than adults debating the merits of an issue and simply choose not to play.
No disagreement with me.
Dealing with these people is like dealing with the Taliban. They are not nice and they are not honest. I opt for shooting them.
just kidding LOL
>> “The response by editor-surveyor was to attack not the substance of what I said, but me personally” <<
.
There was no substance to your post; just a vague unsubstantiated opinion, and my reply could only be taken as a personal attack if your own thoughts (which you failed to specify) were themselves an attack.
Get your self a skin sissy-boy.