To: Lazlo in PA
That’s the one thing that makes me question Sarah Palin. She could have wished him luck. She didn’t have to campaign for him.
11 posted on
06/21/2011 11:43:57 AM PDT by
Terry Mross
(I'll only vote for a SECOND party.)
To: Terry Mross
This ground has been plowed many times before. Sarah endorsed McCain for Senate as a final act of loyalty and that bill is now paid in full. She was presented with a choice between bad and worse and chose bad. Had she failed to endorse him, she would have brought upon herself much more trouble than it was worth. Take it to the bank that Sarah has many, many differences with McCain and his policies. She is done with him.
22 posted on
06/21/2011 12:01:39 PM PDT by
JPG
(Hey, LSM, how are those emails workin' out for ya?)
To: Terry Mross
I’d argue she did indeed have to campaign for him. Barring some family issues or health concern she couldn’t not fully back the man for a Senate seat after so recently backing him for President without looking totally foolish.
35 posted on
06/21/2011 2:00:21 PM PDT by
Eyes Unclouded
("The word bipartisan means some larger-than-usual deception is being carried out." -George Carlin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson