BEAUTY and the THE BEAST
Posted on 06/21/2011 7:36:06 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross
BEAUTY and the THE BEAST
Catholic ping. Since the title takes care of the MoDo ping.
Another Catherine Zeta-Jones thread!
Gay marriage is the only shot MoDo has of EVER wearing a bridal gown.
This.
Guess it's too long for a tagline, eh?
This.
Guess it's too long for a tagline, eh?
As a Catholic I’d have to say that the earlier forms of anti-Caholicism were largely of our own making for being so un-Christian towards people like Martin Luther. And because Church leadership kept taking sides in political battles which they often lost.
Dowd’s form is rooted in the raging anger of Libertines that the Church forms one of the last major roadblocks in the way of their George Soros-style “open society”.
“As a Catholic I’d have to say that the earlier forms of anti-Caholicism were largely of our own making...”
Actually, I find this statement to be somewhat exaggerated. As sinful human beings, Catholics (like all humans) have made mistakes and have chosen what is wrong. However, I think the majority of anti-Catholicism comes from another, far more insidious source.
Archbishop Dolan is a wonderful man, and Mo Do couldn't help but like him, if she gave him half a chance. We miss him in Milwaukee.
You could just use “the sexual revolution has been a snare and a delusion”.
If “Catholic” Maureen Dowd is the face of a new form of anti-Catholicism, what does that make Margaret Sanger and Madeline Murray O’Hare? Former and dissatisfied Catholics are always the most virulent anti-Catholic bigots—not to mention the most dangerous.
” . . . I’d have to say that the earlier forms of anti-Caholicism were largely of our own making for being so un-Christian towards people like Martin Luther. And because Church leadership kept taking sides in political battles which they often lost.”
Whoa . . . if I remember correctly, Martin Luther, among other PROTESTants, took sides against Catholicism. Right or wrong, ecumenically speaking, there’s a DIFFERENCE. If there weren’t, there would be no sides.
Like here, on FR.
Whoa....and if I remember my history correctly, Martin Luther did not chose sides, he stood on the principles of God’s Word,....the Cheif leaders kicked him out (excommunicated).
Martin Luther did not want to leave the Catholic Church, he had no choice, unless he denied the truth!
Protestant or Catholic, we must chose to serve the living God, even if you are type-cast as anti-catholic or anti-protestant.
Maybe we should make the same choice as Joshua. “...choose you this day whom ye will serve,....But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.” (Joshua 24:15)
Dowd should simply look at the Catholic vote and realize they are not her enemy, she probably doesn’t know that little fact.
I'd wager that a majority WILL be her enemy in 2012. The many who were bamboozled by 0's bs rhetoric in '08 have had their eyes opened.
here's a more up to date beast pic
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.