Posted on 06/20/2011 10:58:33 PM PDT by jennychase
Good you aren’t a lawyer, you miss all the facts.
Not my fault that some of you are like gnats at a picnic.
Even when they get smacked, they keep coming back.
Good day to you. I am going to eat my sammich.
That's the fact, Jack, so LOL all you want - it won't change a thing.
She isn’t Palin so we get fed whatever BS from lib journos and you are ready to railroad her outta here.
So the Bachmann camp on their own attacked the Palin supporters - in response to a post WELL ABOVE the one you cited. Yeah, indylindy, FACT. YOU started the attacks on Palin supporters on this thread. The other post was theorizing why Rollins attacked Palin and was NOT about Bachmann supporters.
The more the Bachmann camp posts on FR, the more slimy they get.
Roll Call could write hundreds of articles on this. When all these groups show up in Washington, the left in Congress has been funding them for years.
Go ahead, run off without addressing the topic of the article. Without addressing the other issues by way of declaring them to be old news. Instead, attack the Palin supporters. Just like the slimeball Dem hacks you are emulating here.
Let's do this record thing. Shall we? do you really truly want to stack Bachmann’s record up against GOv Palin’s? let me warn you Bachmann will not come out well in the end. Next you will be telling me Palin raised taxes in Washilla instead of the voters.
Gee...all that spinning smoke and not a word to refute what I wrote about palin’s disastrous ice-rink deal...no surprise there.
A Sarah Palin who was one of the greatest state governors—as described by Stephen K. Bannon—can’t be the same Sarah Palin who “lacked executive skills.”
You might recall the little problem you’ve had in the past with getting confused between Sarah Palin and Tina Fey. Do yourself a favor and look into this.
I could refute it. But it has become a he said/she said thing so what’s the point. the palinhaters have their version Palin supporters have their version. why waste the time. i think the concept that you are still stuck on the lame leftwing talking points from 2008 is more of a tell tthen your “point”
Mail...
Tina Fey is an actress from Saturday Night Live who did a few skits attempting to make fun of Palin. (This caricature was not the real Palin.)
You guys are living in a dream world the left is going to pick your candidate if you don’t watch out. Michelle is as good as they come.
______________________________
No you couldn't, not truthfully or factually.
You can’t refute the facts of Palin’s screw-up in Wasilla with the ice-rink so you trot out Tina Fey? Even you must realize how utterly pathetic that is.
The point is that the images of Tina Fey in your head render your belief system highly susceptible to accepting false notions of Palin.
Such as the claims that Palin “lacked exective ability,” or that anything from her past mischaracterized by political psychopaths as a “screwup” can modify in any way her status as one of our greatest governors.
Look, if we give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you’re a well-meaning conservative poster, the best you can hope for, given your posting history, is that you have somehow been unconsciously influenced by the hardest of the hardcore Marxists to a point where you are able to do nothing other than repeat their talking points.
Marxism is a hideous ideology which fools not only the useful idiots but also the tyrannical masterminds pulling their strings. Both have in the real world defined themselves as mentally weak by the very mechanism with which they celebrate the myth of their intellectualism—that ability to avoid a true understanding of Marxism itself.
_____________________________________
No, the point is that you cannot truthfully dispute the facts of the Palin screw-up that cost Wasilla millions and left them having to employ emminent domain to take the property in question from its legal owner, so you create some fantasy about Tina Fey and attribute it to me.
That is childish, transparent and well, just stupid.
It was a he said/she said legal battle with underhanded operators trying to milk the taxpayers for all they could once it was known the city was interested in the land. Classic legal action to get the highest price for a piece of land and screw the taxpayer.
and around and around it goes he said/she said. She should have did this, they should have done that.
The long and short of it is that the complex was finished ahead of schedule and below cost. You will come back with it could have been even cheaper and I will say that it was completed ahead of schedule and below cost.
We all can play armchair quarterback. Doesn't mean you know what happened nor does it mean you are right.
Like I said it is a waste of time to debate it. and it has nothing to do with Bachmann using taxpayer funds to pay for her career advancment. Obama is using taxpayer funds to campaign and conservatives are knocking him for it. Unless people want to be hypocrites the should also knock Bachmann for doing the same thing Obama is doing.
bachmann may be a good candidate. the results are not in yet. But the fact that she is a pale minnime to Palin is in.
And when we have Palin's record as governor to examine, that is much more relevant. I imagine Palin learned from the skating rink experience and used those lessons at a higher level. Which is why prior executive experience is vital - look at how out of place Obama has been without it.
Let’s await further evidence. Let’s see if she drops out when it becomes obvious after the first few primaries that she won’t be the nominee. If she stays in the race, she is in only to split the conservative vote. Let’s see who she endorses when she drops out. Romney maybe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.