To: fwdude; rellimpank
fwdude: Thilly fellah. If employees were paid for their strength, endurance, and (shall we say) forceful dispositions, gorilla were be higher paid than
Homo sapiens, even the latter were tanked to the gills with testosterone..
How 'bout we look at this from --- I know it's a novel approach --- a free market perspective? And determine pay by the supply/demands conditions the labor market and the employees' profitability to the company?
Hmm, big boy?
16 posted on
06/20/2011 9:45:37 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
((Rolls eyes.))
To: Mrs. Don-o; fwdude; rellimpank
And determine pay by the supply/demands conditions the labor market and the employees' profitability to the company?Or we could just leave it the way it is now, where pay is based on LOOKS and who you will have sex with.
20 posted on
06/20/2011 9:53:50 AM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(Lame and ill-informed post)
To: Mrs. Don-o
Silly, everyone knows women should be paid for their 1) looks, 2) willingness to sit there and look pretty, and 3) ability to cook. Bonuses are paid for child bearing ability but thats usually only applicable after a huge investment in training. Willingness to get drinks and/or snacks during the game are also considerations.
28 posted on
06/20/2011 10:23:14 AM PDT by
driftdiver
(I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson