To: central_va
Are you sure you read what you thought you read?
Friedman is a free trade advocate.
And I quote, "Today, as always, there is much support for tariffs--euphemistically labeled 'protection,' a good label for a bad cause. "
Get your story straight.
86 posted on
06/20/2011 1:25:17 PM PDT by
Dead Corpse
(explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
To: Dead Corpse
Here is the story. The unions are dead. There is no reason to have unrestricted trade if the reason is to break the unions. Union membership is at 6%. During the 1930's ALL trade was less than 5% of the ENTIRE GDP. So either way smoot-hawley had no impact on the duration or depth of the depression. It is a red herring argument and totally irrelevant. There are 22 right to work states were non union workers can produce product at a profit.
![](http://www.dequav.com/Dequav,_Inc./Maps_files/Right%20to%20Work%20Map.jpg)
87 posted on
06/20/2011 2:23:42 PM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson