Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 50mm

>>Stunning that the lefties on the bench went along with this, making it unanimous.
>
>I don’t trust Ginsburg, Kagan or Sotomayor. They’ll use this ruling as precedent for using the 10th for liberal purposes. Mark my words.

“The court today arms the police with a way routinely to dishonor the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement in drug cases,” Ginsburg wrote. “In lieu of presenting their evidence to a neutral magistrate, police officers may now knock, listen, then break the door down, never mind that they had ample time to obtain a warrant.” — Ruth Ginsburg, sole dissent

I have to say, my respect for Ginsburg was increased by the recent [King?] ruling.


63 posted on 06/20/2011 4:38:07 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

Yeah, I know, Ruth “Bussy” Ginsburg shocks you at times, sometimes putting even the “good” ones to shame. Stevens could show amazing common sense once in a great while too. It’s like they have to save up for a few years and splurge it all on one decision or something.


68 posted on 06/20/2011 5:12:56 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson