Replies

But the burden of proof is not on my back, it's on yours.

Eh? Is incoherent burbling now a prerequisite for all online PDS sufferers? "Burden of proof" for what, pray tell? Kindly address your comments to me, rather than to your imaginary friend.

You can project until you are blue in the face about outcomes

Again: LOLWHUT -- ?!? Kindly point to my "project[ed] outcome," please. (I'm not the one monotonously bleating "SHE CAN'T WIN SHE CAN'T WIN SHE CAN'T WIN!!!" on thread after littered thread, after all.) I simply stated bald and incontrovertible fact: if she cannot win, then you have no reason to continue fretting and pouting so. Anything "extra" you've managed to read into that is, thankfully, your problem to deal with, and not my own.

And, constantly attacking other candidates and other conservatives who do not see things the same way you do, is not necessarily smart either.

I do not "attack other conservatives." I do, on the other hand, attack opportunistic RINOs such as Mitt Romney, and point out the demonstrable meekness of patent milquetoasts such as Pawlenty. Cope.