To: ncalburt
I think yours is the most reasonable scenario I have seen. And yes they are to be commended. Her supporters can parse her statements all they want, but she has implied she raised the children.
This should have stayed a feel good back story. When she moved it o the front page of her resume she put it in play.
26 posted on
06/18/2011 8:08:52 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(JMO but I reserve the right to be wrong...)
To: gov_bean_ counter
I have a good friend who does this service .
Its a stressful life and rewarding.
50 posted on
06/18/2011 10:08:42 PM PDT by
ncalburt
(NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !)
To: gov_bean_ counter
“but she has implied she raised the children.” Implied? When? What did she actually SAY that “impled” she “raised” the 23 children from birth? see Digger48’s post above.
55 posted on
06/18/2011 11:24:00 PM PDT by
ngat
To: gov_bean_ counter
Her supporters can parse her statements all they want, but she has implied she raised the children.Michelle stated the facts and you inferred that she claimed that she "raised them" from the moment of conception until their 18th birthday.
Your inference has nothing to do with her very clear statement.
You truly do work for the government and are as conservative as dukakas or mondale or romney.
67 posted on
06/19/2011 4:36:04 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist savages.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson