Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: circlecity
Science hasn't changed.

Neither has the “god of the gaps” argument.

May as well try to explain the Universe sticking together with Angels or “the Force” instead of proposing a natural cause in “dark matter”.

Dark matter is a unsupported hypothesis - but it is science.

Angels holding it together or “the Force” are not science - and they never will be.

That isn't arbitrary or narrow - it is what it is.

95 posted on 06/17/2011 7:15:04 PM PDT by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream
Neither has the “god of the gaps” argument."

This has nothing to do with a "God of the gaps" agrument. If you claim it does please identify the "scientific" boundries of the "gap" you claim God is being plugged into.

98 posted on 06/17/2011 7:17:58 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: allmendream
"Dark matter is a unsupported hypothesis - but it is science."

No it's not. It's merely unsupported speculation as to why the traditional cosmologic constucts don't comply with the observable data. I have as much data to support to the speculation there is an invisible Angel directing the behavior of celestial bodies as science does that "dark matter" performs this phenomenon.

104 posted on 06/17/2011 7:24:37 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson