Posted on 06/17/2011 5:24:51 AM PDT by statestreet
The NY-09 gave President Bush 45% (IIRC) in 2004, a huge uptick from the 30% or so he got there in 2000. I believe that it was the biggest increase for President Bush in the nation—Bush did much better among Jewish (particularly Orthodox Jewish) voters the second time around, due not only to September 11 but to the fact that Orthodox Jewish Democrat Joe Lieberman was not running for VP. McCain did a bit worse than 45%, but not much worse. In the Brooklyn portion of the district (which is heavily Orthodox Jewish), I believe that both Bush and McCain got 57%.
So the district could be competitive for the right Republican. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that a Jewish Republican would give us a better chance, and an Orthodox Jewish Republican would be ideal. While it is true that neither Bush nor McCain is Jewish, the Democrats will run a Jewish candidate, not run a haughty patrician from Massachusetts not a black crypto-Muslim from God knows where, so a generic GOP candidate would start off with less than the 45% that Bush got. We need a Jewish Republican to have a chance. Mr. Ulrich may be a terrific candidate (I don’t know), but he won’t get the type of Orthodox Jewish support and turnout needed to pull off the upset.
And as for the theory that the district will be “eliminated” in redistricting, I doubt that Nadler will want even more Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods in his CD, and the black-majority districts to its north would be a bad fit as well. It would make more sense to place the Brooklyn Orthodox Jewish neighborhoods that are currently split among Weiner’s and Nadler’s CDs in the same district, which would make it (i) even more competitive for the GOP and (ii) even more unlikely to elect a non-Jewish candidate. So redistricting is yet another reason why we should run an Orthodox Jewish candidate.
Re the redistring math..suggets you read Costa’s piece about it in nationalreview.com...He say that a neighboring Dem wants to grab white Catholic neighbrhoods from the 9th...
I assume that it’s Crowley wanting to grab Catholic neighborhoods from the Queens part of the NY-09; and I’m sure that Ackerman wouldn’t mind Jewish neighborhoods in Queens going over to his CD. The problem is that the Brooklyn part of the district, where all the Orthodox Jews live, is fast-growing, as are the adjoining neighborhoods in Nadler’s CD. The only CDs that could absorb the Brooklyn neighborhoods are Nadler’s, the two black-majority CDs in Brooklyn, the Hispanic-majority NY-12, and the GOP-held Staten Island/Bensonhurst NY-13. The NY-13 doesn’t have to grow by all that much, and none of the Dems would want those neighborhoods, so I think they’ll have to draw a Jewish CD in Brooklyn.
It may be winnable, but what happens if Ulrich wins? The district may dissappear in 2012.
You're from the future! Does Obama win??
Ulrich could run in the new district against the “incumbent” Dem but a GOP win here would wipe the NY26 Dem win out. They love to crow over that one.
I find it hard to believe that voters who would vote for Weiner to represent their “values” would ever vote for a Republican.
Yeah this is one of those seats where going from 44/45 to 50 will be hard. We need every advantage.
Our “goyim” candidate in 2010 got 39%.
He was a “goy” candidate (”goyim” is the plural). “Goyim” is one of those foreign plural words that is often used in singular form in English because it doesn’t end in an S and since the plural form is more common. Similarly, the thin sandwich at a salumeria is a “panino” (”panini” is the plural) and one piece of information is a “datum” (”data” is the plural).
And that’s my grammar tip of the day. : )
Thanks. ;-D
I didn’t know that about the sandwich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.