Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: paudio

Are you now saying there has to legally be a religiously compelling reason in your eyes before they are not guilty of some crime?


43 posted on 06/17/2011 9:47:58 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Hawk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Not that they are guilty for some crime, but I'd prefer people representing religious group to simply say what they have in mind without beating the bushes. It has nothing to do with my opinion on their theological position. It's more about when sharing their beliefs, they better say what exactly they beliefs are and say it in sincere way. If they feel 'shame' or for whatever reasons they don't want 'outsider' or 'new people' to understand it, I think there's something problematic with the way they share it.

For instance, I once encountered a lady from a Christian group that approached me in a park asking if I'd like to participate in a survey. I said yes. Then the lady started to ask whether I believe in God, and so on, without having any questionnaire. It turned out she wanted me to go to her church. So, they use a standard opening for people to talk to them to cover their real intention.

I have a feeling the way this person answered also had similar issue. If they have problem with the US being militaristic society, they should say it clearly.

44 posted on 06/19/2011 4:47:07 PM PDT by paudio (The differences between Clinton and 0bama? About a dozen of former Democratic Congressmen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson