You presented the article as current. If you have a point to make, you can make it without yanking people’s chains.
Would have helped if you’d kind of given the 2006 alert up front - your explanation makes sense.
So who is your preferred candidate?
Then, why did Rove recently say she was too inexperienced to President?
http://gop12.thehill.com/2011/04/karl-rove-on-bachmanns-chances.html
"The people who are going to be disposed to vote against Barack Obama are going to look back and say 'You know what, we took the untested guy who had no significant achievements, and it didn't work out so well'.
So Michele Bachmann and others who've not had extensive records -- I mean, Ronald Reagan was the governor of the most populous state in the union.... he had a record as an executive who made big decisions.
And next year, it's going to be important for people to say 'You can look at my background and look at what I've done in my life, and have confidence that I'm going to be able to do the things that I'm saying I want to do. Because last time around, we took hope and change and it didn't work out so well for a lot of people."