Government is too damn big, too damn intrusive, too damn expensive.”
YES!
And defining marriage between one man and one woman, as it has been done for millenia is NOT the problem, its the solution. Strong families are like antibodies for cultural dissolution and are a preventative to massive Govt.
All big Govt schemes involve the Govt REPLACING families. Comunists, nazis, leftist communes, etc. ALL replaced parental direction with Govt indoctrination.
Which is why destruction of families and family values is a biggies with the Left. Easier to shape minds with pesky parents out of the way. Easier to redefine values when you destroy moral values in law.
Libertarian chicken-s*** attitude on families and marriage is a big gift to the Left.
Bravo to Ann Coulter for pointing this out.
” Ron Paul says a bunch stuff I don’t necessarily agree with, but he is the closest candidate to true constitutionalism as one can get.” Maybe, but this agenda of upending marriage has NOTHING to do with upholding the Constitution. Hurting traditional marriage will hurt the Constitution.
The constitution is the guiding document, nowhere in the constitution does it address gay marriage.
Using this logic, one could dream up any sort of argument to justify government intrusion into peoples lives.
Now, should we pass a constitutional amendment protecting marriage between one man and one woman....YES. This would be a constitutional process in which to amend the law of the land...I'm all for it.
But until then, follow the dedgum Constitution and stop this ever growing beast called the federal government.