Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Valpal1
That pretty much sums it up.

Its also why gay activists don't want government out of the marriage business and don't just do a basic "sign a will/and give the partner power of attorney".

Some libertarians have proposed only allowed civil unions (recognized by the government) for straight and gay folks, while leaving "marriage" itself to whatever religious institution there is.

Gay activists are opposed to that too, they want the benefits of marriage and also the laziness of avoiding the issues of contract law and courts.

40 posted on 06/15/2011 3:05:23 PM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Sonny M
Some libertarians have proposed only allowed civil unions (recognized by the government) for straight and gay folks, while leaving "marriage" itself to whatever religious institution there is.

Gay activists are opposed to that too, they want the benefits of marriage...

No, they want to destroy the Institution of Marriage by polluting it with their perversionistic "life" (read death) style.

49 posted on 06/15/2011 3:29:10 PM PDT by Syncro (Sarah Palin, the unofficial Tea Party candidate for president--Virtual Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Sonny M

Some libertarians have proposed only allowed civil unions “(recognized by the government) for straight and gay folks, while leaving “marriage” itself to whatever religious institution there is.”

That’s what they say.

What people HEAR is: “Hey, I am totally unrealistically clueless about our real culture and how the real world works.”


54 posted on 06/15/2011 3:40:29 PM PDT by WOSG (Herman Cain for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson