To: Wisconsinlady
Now we will see if LaFollette holds up publishing the law again. The Supreme Court decision also had an explicit statement that the Secretary of State had no legitimate reason to not publish the bill.
92 posted on
06/15/2011 5:23:11 AM PDT by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: PapaBear3625
interesting, this means that the sec of state can ignore the judges in the future.
96 posted on
06/15/2011 6:30:58 AM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson