Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Supreme Court overrules Sumi
radio report ^

Posted on 06/14/2011 3:25:02 PM PDT by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: PapaBear3625

“(2) . . . No law shall be in force until published

Now we will see if LaFollette holds up publishing the law again.


81 posted on 06/14/2011 7:27:02 PM PDT by Wisconsinlady (DEFUND NPR, PBS, THE TSA AND THE U.N.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Best news I heard all day!


82 posted on 06/14/2011 7:39:18 PM PDT by ladyvet ( I would rather have Incitatus then the asses that are in congress today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2111USMC

This is such good news. Those people were animals and should have gone to jail. Now they just go on home. They are all done.


83 posted on 06/14/2011 7:40:50 PM PDT by aunt nome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

A Higher Power has finally intervened to show the way to social justice in Wisconsin under His laws.

Praises that a majority in the WI SC finally got His message.


84 posted on 06/14/2011 7:56:27 PM PDT by saltus (God's Will be done)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oldbrowser
This was not a victory. This was a narrow escape. The ruling was 4 to 3 in the governor's favor.

That's why the Liberals fought so hard in the recent judicial election. We care about the rule of law; they only care about victory.

85 posted on 06/14/2011 8:25:18 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

I don’t see how. This decision was made by the Wisconsin Supreme Court. A separate branch of government which probably can publish its own decisions without approval of the Secretary of State.


86 posted on 06/14/2011 8:25:51 PM PDT by Maine Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

It was a 4-3 decision. Pathetic


87 posted on 06/14/2011 8:40:49 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

and the RATS, take another one in the.........HA ha!!!

88 posted on 06/14/2011 9:05:35 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

THE BATTLE FOR WISCONSIN

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag_kNanInsI


89 posted on 06/14/2011 9:13:57 PM PDT by doug from upland (Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
Hallelujah!
90 posted on 06/14/2011 9:29:03 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Wow. Fabulous!


91 posted on 06/14/2011 11:29:01 PM PDT by Jeff Winston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady
Now we will see if LaFollette holds up publishing the law again.

The Supreme Court decision also had an explicit statement that the Secretary of State had no legitimate reason to not publish the bill.

92 posted on 06/15/2011 5:23:11 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LostInBayport

Her son was an activist for the SEIU and the AFL/CIO. He now has his own PR Agency that provides Lobbying and Ads for Dems. She should have recused herself based on conflict of interest. Glad to see the Supreme Court rebuke her.


93 posted on 06/15/2011 6:18:52 AM PDT by Old Retired Army Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tarantulas

This is a MAJOR slap at the lower judge.

Essentially the SC dressed her down like a first year law student.

Does anyone know if this means union dues are no longer deducted?


94 posted on 06/15/2011 6:22:03 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

want to bet that CNN and MSNBC will now avoid/blackout the story as “nothing to see move along”?

this preserves the ugly unionistas as the only voice (communist) and denys the American voice.


95 posted on 06/15/2011 6:28:55 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: PapaBear3625

interesting, this means that the sec of state can ignore the judges in the future.


96 posted on 06/15/2011 6:30:58 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Now they need to recall that Marxist activist!


97 posted on 06/15/2011 6:31:37 AM PDT by PSYCHO-FREEP (Always Remember You're Unique.......(Just Like everyone Else.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man

will the unions have to pay the state’s legal fees?


98 posted on 06/15/2011 6:34:19 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Wisconsinlady

[they are reading the same constitution and coming up with different interpretations]

I don’t think they are reading the Constitution other than to figure out ways to get around it. They do not interpret the Constitution, they disregard it.


99 posted on 06/15/2011 6:50:02 AM PDT by KansasGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

The WI Sec State is a Dem who wanted any excuse to not allow the anti-union bill to take effect. The WI Supremes told him in the decision that he has no further excuse.


100 posted on 06/15/2011 7:32:17 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson