The fix is in.
1 posted on
06/13/2011 7:48:06 PM PDT by
SmithL
Ware, James
- Born 1946 in Birmingham, AL
Federal Judicial Service:
Judge, U. S. District Court, Northern District of California
Nominated by George H.W. Bush on August 3, 1990, to a seat vacated by Robert F. Peckham; Confirmed by the Senate on September 28, 1990, and received commission on October 1, 1990. Served as chief judge, 2010-present.
Education:
California Lutheran University, B.A., 1969
Stanford Law School, J.D., 1972
Professional Career:
U.S. Army Reserve Second Lieutenant, 1972
U.S. Army, Military Police, 1973
U.S. Army Reserve Captain, Military Police, 1973-1986
Private practice, Palo Alto, California, 1972-1988
Judge, Santa Clara County Superior Court, 1988-1990
2 posted on
06/13/2011 7:48:28 PM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Perhaps Walker’s relationship is with Ware.
3 posted on
06/13/2011 7:51:02 PM PDT by
Colonel_Flagg
("Mr. Romney and Mr. Obama are not rivals, they're running mates." - Rep. Thaddeus McCotter)
To: SmithL
Keep in mind the prop 22 and prop 8 folks are only reacting to the laws passed against them by guys to indoctrinate their children.
No one cares what they do in their bedroom but we don’t what them teaching our children how to put on condoms and any sex is ok.
Society has a right to define itself and what it accepts as normal, always adjusting the ring.
4 posted on
06/13/2011 7:53:29 PM PDT by
edcoil
(What? Me worry.)
To: SmithL
There may be ways to overturn or vacate the Prop 8 ruling, this is not one of them.
To: SmithL
Don’t most gay-normers believe in “gay” marriage?
To: SmithL
Warning!
Use of the terms “gay” and “tossing” in the same sentence could be an FR zottable offense!
10 posted on
06/13/2011 9:34:08 PM PDT by
G Larry
(I dream of a day when a man is judged by the content of his character)
To: SmithL
The fix isn't in. The argument is ridiculous. It's like saying religious judges can't rule on those first amendment issues, a minority judge can't rule on civil rights, or no judge can rule on Social Security because it'll effect him in old age, etc.
The ruling itself is flawed. There was no reason to make it personal.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson