You told me to read their words because their words supposedly showed their intent in line with your theory. You posted the text for me to read, I read it, and the plain text clearly opposed your theory. You can't portray their words as both reliable and unreliable sources on the subject of their intent.
If they control the on/off ramps, then they control the content anyways. These are defacto toll booths.
Again, you are going very far away from the words you posted. Evidence, give me evidence. Show me in a rule where the FCC will charge consumers or Internet-based companies in a way that hurts the neutrality of the Internet. A toll booth charges. Without charges, it's not a toll booth. I need specifics, not vagueness, not conspiracy theory. I've read the FCC rules, don't see a thing in there about toll booths, actual or de-facto. Maybe I missed something, but I doubt it.
————in line with your theory.-————
It’s not really a theory. There’s very, very little room for much theory here.
We know they only listen to marxist groups. We know many of them are marxists themselves. And we know that they engage in all kinds of propaganda.
When a marxist talks about controlling on/off ramps, they aren’t talking about the kind of purist simple regulations that one would think.(even though that’s how they’ll make it sound)
When a marxist talks about controlling on/off ramps, they are talking about something very, very evil and dark. There’s no reason to think otherwise.
-———Maybe I missed something, but I doubt it.—————
You didn’t miss it. They haven’t codified it yet. We have a century of progressivism to work with here, by the time it’s codified it will be too late.