Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

Yeah...I’m no law scholar...but I’ve never read about any powers given to the FBI to make laws.


6 posted on 06/13/2011 4:01:48 AM PDT by Vigilantcitizen (I got a fever and the only prescription is more watermelon trickworm, better known as bass crack.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilantcitizen
I'm almost willing to bet these are "new" powers under either the PATRIOT Act or via EO's.

Neither have a Constitutional basis when they start negating arbitrarily parts of the Bill of Rights.

24 posted on 06/13/2011 5:36:06 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (explosive bolts, ten thousand volts at a million miles an hour)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Vigilantcitizen
From the article:

"Valerie Caproni, the FBI general counsel, said the bureau had fixed the problems with the national security letters and had taken steps to make sure they would not recur. She also said the bureau -- which does not need permission to alter its manual so long as the rules fit within broad guidelines issued by the attorney general -- had carefully weighed the risks and the benefits of each change."

They're weighing the benefit of violating our 4th Amendment rights against unlawful search and seizure against the risk of getting caught and being held responsible. It looks like they feel confident in their ability to succeed.

42 posted on 06/13/2011 10:10:29 AM PDT by callisto (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson