I will try to summarize this next part...
The National Cancer Institute was in charge of the clinical trials. They wanted to change the protocols, and DID so, against the doctors strong objection. The doctor was able to stop the trials, since they were not being administered correctly. The trials showed no effective treatment before they were closed, but they published the incomplete findings anyway, to discredit the doctor.
The good news was that within the findings, was the evidence of the minimal amounts of the doctor’s drug in the patients bloodwork. The bad news was that these patients did not survive. The NCI had insisted on “changing” the protocols, (in reality, lessening the amount of drug necessary), and further there is testimony from a doctor who was on staff at the NCI for 6 years...that the NCI does this to ensure that the new therapy is ineffective....
Tatt
Oh my gosh.... the United States Government now holds the patent to the doctor’s drug... they named another inventor, and even used Burzynski as a “reference”...
“The invention described herein, may be manufactured, used and licensed by or of the Government, for Governmental purposes”
May God give us strength, to turn these people out.
Tatt
This doctor should have left the US & started manufacturing/using the drug in some sane country that isn’t beholden to the US. Maybe he should give the information to China. Anything to get it out there, if it’s for real.
Thanks ever so much. I intend to go through the entire article but unfortunately won’t have time for a bit. This is just one issue of many just blows my mind!
like they did with quick HCQ study, they OD very ill covid vets with toxic levels of HCQ, which was really meant as an early treatment. Dont trust FDA, NIH, CDC