I’m not changing the subject. Did you forget you jumped into an existing conversation?
The false premise was Huma’s trip to Saudi Arabia offered evidence - it doesn’t.
Your argument amounts to saying Muslims lie, and Muslims want to subvert our country. Sure, some Muslims do, and there’s is a movement, but the notion that every Muslim in the State Department, or with high level clearance is a treasonous spy doesn’t fly. Let’s say you’re correct though - it’s still a huge leap to then figure Weiner is a covert Islamic spy too.
These people are sleazy enough that there’s no need to lambast them with conjecture/presumed guilt.