Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum

At least she didn’t embarrass us this time, for a change. And I doubt she paid for the gown. Most designers loan gowns to the current first lady just for the free advertising it represents.


22 posted on 06/10/2011 6:19:59 PM PDT by ottbmare (off-the-track Thoroughbred mare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ottbmare
Most designers loan gowns to the current first lady just for the free advertising it represents.

They should just give it to her...who else would wear it now??

52 posted on 06/10/2011 6:45:44 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: ottbmare; Nachum
At least she didn’t embarrass us this time, for a change. And I doubt she paid for the gown. Most designers loan gowns to the current first lady just for the free advertising it represents.

As I said to another FReeper, read the article, she has had the dress since 2009 when she first wore it. She bought and paid for it and isn't giving it back. You and I paid for it actually, I would bet that she hasn't spent a dime of her own money to buy her clothes.

110 posted on 06/10/2011 9:21:44 PM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson