Skip to comments.
First Lady shimmers in expensive gown at low-key state dinner
CBS News ^
| 6/10/11
| Christine Delargy
Posted on 06/10/2011 6:02:02 PM PDT by Nachum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
To: hal ogen
I knew I’d hook somebody with that. LOL
101
posted on
06/10/2011 9:05:23 PM PDT
by
Gator113
("GAME ON." I'll be voting for Sarah Palin, Liberty, our Constitution and American Exceptionalism.)
To: Nachum
Known for her fashion, What a frickin' lie. The only thing she is really known for is how to look shI**y in just about anything she wears. Just because something costs a lot of money doesn't mean it looks good.
102
posted on
06/10/2011 9:07:05 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: American Quilter
Those in that part of the honor guard are not Marines.
To: JoeProBono
To: linn37; gitmo
Im old enough to remember all the flack Nancy Reagan got for her gowns. Not to mention Palin's wardrobe on the VP campaign trail. Where are all those intrepid news people who were so worried about McCain's campaign money being wasted on Palin's clothes? Aren't they interested in how the first Bozo can afford all the thousands of dollars of clothes she has shown up in since the election?
105
posted on
06/10/2011 9:11:33 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: celtic gal
.she probably gave it back after the dinner If you would read the article you would see she wore the dress back in 2009 for the first time. I would say she bought and paid for it with our(taxpayers)money, and the same with all of her other atrocious evening wear.
106
posted on
06/10/2011 9:13:32 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: Krodg
Well, here is a thought in this case....she wears it, they get the publicity and then when they get that dirty dress back they burn it.
To: Leo Carpathian
Is Bozo getting shorter? His pants always seem so long in the leg. The first wookie's hair looks like she either stuck her finger in a light socket or something scared the sh** out of her.
Bozo with too long of a pant and the Wookie with dozens of sweaters that are two sizes too small. Some fashion plates alright.
108
posted on
06/10/2011 9:18:56 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: Las Vegas Ron
I keep waiting for Mrs. Obama to be featured on Joan Rivers’ “Fashion Police” show, but I've been disappointed.
109
posted on
06/10/2011 9:20:58 PM PDT
by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: ottbmare; Nachum
At least she didnt embarrass us this time, for a change. And I doubt she paid for the gown. Most designers loan gowns to the current first lady just for the free advertising it represents. As I said to another FReeper, read the article, she has had the dress since 2009 when she first wore it. She bought and paid for it and isn't giving it back. You and I paid for it actually, I would bet that she hasn't spent a dime of her own money to buy her clothes.
110
posted on
06/10/2011 9:21:44 PM PDT
by
calex59
To: Las Vegas Ron
I don’t see the “design” part of it.
111
posted on
06/10/2011 9:22:43 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(I love BULL MARKETS . . .)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
![](http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/06/08/AP110607163521.jpg)
Miss Pelosi appears to be wearing a breastfeeding gown with easy access flaps. Who the heck is feeding from her cold boobs?
112
posted on
06/10/2011 9:30:46 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: Las Vegas Ron
I think it’s a lovely dress and it suits her. But why is she playing with it in every picture?
113
posted on
06/10/2011 9:32:17 PM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: alice_in_bubbaland
I honestly have to say this this is the nicest outfit that I have seen her wear. So far, the only one with some class.![](http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/06/08/michelleobama_germany_540x405_2_244x183.jpg)
I think the Japanese term is caboose-ski.
To: Nachum
Remember the big stink when the McCain campaign used a few thousand dollars to make Sarah Palin look a little more fashionable. The dems demanded a full scale investigation.
Ok, that’s fair. Now lets see if they make a stink about these $5000 gowns and $1000 shoes and $3000 purses that Michelle always seems to be wearing. Where is the money coming for these duds?
115
posted on
06/10/2011 10:39:04 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Las Vegas Ron
Erkle and Cruella DeVille
116
posted on
06/10/2011 10:42:26 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: calex59
What a frickin' lie. The only thing she is really known for is how to look shI**y in just about anything she wears. Just because something costs a lot of money doesn't mean it looks good. She looks absolutely hideous in these expensive gowns.
117
posted on
06/10/2011 10:45:47 PM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: mewzilla
If she didn’t pay for it, then I guess she figured she’d wear whatever random size they gave her. Wasn’t there a media-fluster about Nancy Reagan’s accepting clothing from designers? I’m sure it would be totally different - like everything is - if a Democrat were doing it.
118
posted on
06/11/2011 4:15:29 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
("WWSP?" - What Would Sionnsar Post?)
To: Yaelle
119
posted on
06/11/2011 4:33:00 AM PDT
by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: Tax-chick
120
posted on
06/11/2011 5:19:01 AM PDT
by
JoeProBono
(A closed mouth gathers no feet)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson