Posted on 06/09/2011 8:26:44 AM PDT by Bed_Zeppelin
A Milpitas man who used a computer to paste photos of his 13-year-old daughter's head onto bodies of women in graphic poses shouldn't have been convicted of possessing child pornography because the pictures didn't show minors engaging in sex acts, a state appeals court ruled Wednesday.
California's child porn ban, punishable by up to three years in prison, "requires a real child to have actually engaged in or simulated the sexual act depicted," said the Sixth District Court of Appeal in San Jose.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
True Laz!
Indeed, pedophile criminals will stop at nothing, and now they are trying to find loopholes into actively harassing and nagging at their victims through such antics.
Kind of like the murderer with no life, getting out on parole, and still strutting around with a complicit media telling “his side” of the story.
So long he does not criticize her and the equally cold and evil goberment system, dads like this can have visitation.
Even is California, the family courts, not to mention criminal, might take issue with him giving his daughter pot and cocaine.
It's the judges who need to see stars...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.