Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hometoroost

No you didn’t...I never asked you to agree with me, only clarify your statement, which you didn’t...When you could not do that, you went south, and somehow the vortex sucked me in again...

You think you have an understanding of the Second Amendment, personal security, personal privacy, Law Enforcement and Politics, you may be close on some things but whatever you have said in this doesn’t seem to fit very well...

I will not waste anymore of my time on this with you, your response to this will absolutely prove my point...


63 posted on 06/13/2011 4:06:10 AM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: stevie_d_64

My final reply to you proves nothing other than the points I was trying to make which did not come across to you for some reason. First, no law abiding citizen should be required to identify their carry status. Second, if they are the police have better things to do than warn each other to be on the look out for those that do.


64 posted on 06/13/2011 6:14:54 AM PDT by hometoroost (Per Oceander: The only guarantees in life are death, taxes, and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson