Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
Judge Vinson didn’t grant an injunction because he thought it was self-evident that the executive branch should not do unconstitutional things, so his ruling that Obamacare is unconstitutional is essentially the same thing as an injunction. Of course the Obama administration doesn’t care about that little detail.

Have any of the opposing parties asked Vinson for an injunction on implementation since the Judge's ruling was apparently too subtle the Obama thugocracy? By the time this thing gets to SCOTUS it will be a done deal (which is no doubt the plan).

53 posted on 06/09/2011 8:25:47 AM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius, (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Menehune56
Judge Vinson didn’t grant an injunction because he thought it was self-evident that the executive branch should not do unconstitutional things...

You would think that on the basis of that impeccable logic the 11th Circuit would be aghast at the actions of Zero & Co. and as a result issue an immediate injunction against any implementation of O'care. But that looks at this point like a pipe dream. These judges do not give me the warm fuzzies.

55 posted on 06/09/2011 8:36:37 AM PDT by Tonytitan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson