Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mount Athos

I guess i don’t quite understand why any of the courts who have declared the law unconstitutional could not order an injunction on further implementation until it is finally decided at SCOTUS. In all other controversial cases in the court system, the court orders this injunction. Obama and his merry men go frolicking along implementing this travesty as if no court has ruled against them. Why can’t a court put a stop to it?


44 posted on 06/08/2011 1:27:22 PM PDT by TexasRedeye (Eschew obfuscation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasRedeye
Obama and his merry men go frolicking along implementing this travesty as if no court has ruled against them. Why can’t a court put a stop to it?

I'm quite convinced that, if enjoined to stop implementing Obamacare, that Obama would simply ignore the order.

Impeachment does not scare him. He knows that the Senate wouldn't convict.

45 posted on 06/09/2011 7:55:28 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Anthony Weiner is a little cocky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: TexasRedeye

Judge Vinson didn’t grant an injunction because he thought it was self-evident that the executive branch should not do unconstitutional things, so his ruling that Obamacare is unconstitutional is essentially the same thing as an injunction. Of course the Obama administration doesn’t care about that little detail.


49 posted on 06/09/2011 8:08:48 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson