Replies

Having a global outlook in trade and foreign policy does not equate to one having a view of a nationless world or a world without borders.

Yes it does, because the globalist institutions that have 'enabled' the 'global outlook' have set as a goal to eliminate nations-- borders and citizens are a 'barrier to trade' in their own words.

Yet that does not mean he believes in a borderless society.

When you allow a foreign country to establish sovereign territory - a mini china with Chinese citizens, Chinese culture, working for the Chinese government within your nation, it's not only a globalist view point -our border is no longer functioning, but a violation of the United States Constitution which says it is not permitted to create a 'state within a state', which is exactly what the Chinese communists want to do. And when the governor of a state in the United States is so ignorant of his Constitution, or not ignorant but so willing to violate it, well that says a lot about the loyalty of the Idaho governor to the United States, doesn't it. He's sounding more and more like Chicom owned Senator Dianne Feinstein and he probably can't get the notion of how much personal profit he'll make dealing with the Chinese like Feinstein does, out of his mind.

Foreign ownership of domestic property has existed throughout history and throughout American history.

The big lie. Foreign governments haven't established sovereign states in this country-- until now-- The globalists enable this by lying about it,then organize to dumb down the American people so that their elected officials violate the laws of the nations with impunity, and always in favor of the foreign interests, where their personal fortunes can be made.

US corporations own $4 trillion in overseas assets.

Let me help you focus on the topic: The CHINESE GOVERNMENT 'owning' a sovereign state within the state of Idaho is treason.

What China sets up will not be a soveriegn nation within a nation. Its an economic zone. The only sovereign properties on US soil are the foreign embassies. The Chinese economic zones are still under American jurisdiction. Someone cannot seek assylum in these economic zones. But they can at a foreign embassy.

They may have Chinese communities set up within these zones, but they simply cannot operate outside of the legal jurisdiction of the US. And this is no different than foreigners owning property and businesses on US soil. They may own the companies, but they still have to follow US laws. That's why Westinghouse, which is now owned by the Japanese, had to get approval by Congress to sell the Chinese their latest reactor design.

The reality is, any company in the world who owns property in another country that is not their own, is at the mercy of the host country. Pure and simple. America has frozen assets of foreign entities, whether that foreign entity is a private or government entity. And likewise, American assets have been flat out taken away by host countries overseas (typically, when there is a revolution by a new government hostile to the US). We don't live in a one world government. So foreign assets only exists, when the countries are not at war. Once hostilities starts, all titles are torn up. Or at least nulled until things settle down.