Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker
That IMO is the hard reality of the 2012 race.

I agree with most of this. However, if Sarah Palin doesn't run, but backs any one of these other candidates instead, they instantly become electable. Having been a FredHead who was burned before, I'm not putting all my eggs in one basket again.

37 posted on 06/08/2011 9:01:23 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross
However, if Sarah Palin doesn't run, but backs any one of these other candidates instead, they instantly become electable.

If her mini-me isn't careful Sarah just might back TPaw, sending both Mitt & Michele packing.

38 posted on 06/08/2011 9:04:58 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

I hear you on the Fred-burning, I was there too. But I don’t think Palin’s backing makes any of those electable. It’s Mitt or TPaw in a walk against any of them.


39 posted on 06/08/2011 9:44:17 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson