Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385

It would have destroyed the Republican brand for 2010.

Old post, but true.

If the vice presidential candidate for John McCain and the the biggest GOP superstar since Reagan had not supported McCain for reelection for his Senate seat, then it would have meant the destruction of her image, and of the GOP image and it would have been the non stop political story of 2009 and 2010, the division between the ticket of the previous year would have made the Republicans appear broken and shattered and would even have led to a widespread reevaluation of the importance of a Democrat victory in 2008, because it would make the GOP ticket look like it had been a sham, it would have damaged and have prevented this incredible change in public opinion towards the entire republican brand that Palin has helped reshape during the last 17 months.

Palin would have looked cheap and shallow to the general public for turning on the man that 59,000,000 of them voted for, she would easily be painted as a radical and unstable person and a bitter, small timer to the general public.

There is a lot more going on with the national image of the republican/conservative movement here than what we McCain haters see in the Arizona Senate race, the general public does not share all of our perceptions and in depth view of the race between McCain and Hayworth. They would see the Presidential and the vice Presidential candidates of the Republican party at each others throats, clearly signaling that Obama and the Democrats represented stability and calm.

Palin’s image would have never survived, and the entire national, conservative movement would be weaker in reality and in the public’s eye.


32 posted on 06/08/2011 4:32:33 PM PDT by ansel12 (Bachmann/Rollins/Romney=destruction for Bachmann, but it sure helps Romney. WHY?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
It would have destroyed the Republican brand for 2010.

The Republican brand has already been destroyed for years, and the party can thank George "I Love Big Government" W. Bush (and others like him) for that.

They would see the Presidential and the vice Presidential candidates of the Republican party at each others throats

McCain spent years attacking the Republican Party, something that improved his image in front of the liberal half of the American electorate.

Oh, wait, that wasn't what you meant...

Palin’s image would have never survived, and the entire national, conservative movement would be weaker in reality and in the public’s eye.

That excuse is as pathetic as Bush's excuse for the bailouts: he had to "destroy capitalism to save it."

If you keep endorsing Socialism to save conservatism, in the end, all you will have is Socialism.

33 posted on 06/08/2011 4:42:46 PM PDT by rabscuttle385 (Live Free or Die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson