Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Publius
At other times, he willingly embraced the doctrine of implied powers himself.

Of course he did. He knew exactly what the necessary and proper clause meant. He was a political creature. His record is full of flip-flops and incoherence. In the end, he did more harm to liberty than good.

11 posted on 06/07/2011 7:45:58 PM PDT by Huck (The Antifederalists were right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
In the end, he did more harm to liberty than good.

Phooey!

17 posted on 06/07/2011 8:18:11 PM PDT by dr_lew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Huck; Publius; dr_lew
Of course he did (willingly embrace the doctrine of implied powers). He knew exactly what the necessary and proper clause meant.

Suppose you explain to us exactly what Madison (and Jefferson) meant by “implied powers” and how the necessary and proper clause applies to that concept?

21 posted on 06/07/2011 8:59:08 PM PDT by YHAOS (you betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson