Posted on 06/06/2011 6:28:18 PM PDT by RobinMasters
The recently released immigration file for Barack Obama Sr. indicates the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service had doubts he and Obama's mother were married.
While Ann Dunham may have sought Obama Sr. as her husband and the father of her child, the record suggests the two never lived together as a married couple.
As WND reported, there's no record of Ann Dunham's whereabouts during the last six months of her pregnancy.
Moreover, within weeks of the baby's birth, Dunham left Honolulu with her infant son and traveled to Seattle, where she enrolled in night courses at the University of Washington. She did not return to Honolulu until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in September 1962 to attend graduate courses at Harvard.
The INS file shows that Barack Obama Sr. was not faithful to Dunham, even when the two were in Hawaii at the same time.
Instead, the documentation supports the conclusion that Obama Sr. and Dunham took part in a sham marriage that the Kenyan student thought might help him extend his visa and remain in the United States to continue his education.
Economic necessity and his desire to complete his studies as soon as possible forced Obama Sr. to remain in Honolulu during the summer months, both to take summer classes and to work part-time.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Correct, any judge could have amended the birth record based on Obama’s “testimony” in 2008 if the Judge wanted to. For any reason he wanted to. For “national security” or for no real reason at all. The whole system in Hawaii has been set up for easy scams since forever. This point is far to often overlooked.
pssssstt..... I’m only going to say this one more time.... STOP ASSUMING THAT ANNOUNCEMENT WAS EVER IN THE PAPER. All it takes is ONE newspaper from that date. Just one that has been authenticated. However, 4 from credible people, that had been authenticated would be even better, no? I guess the next question would have to be... who screwed with the microfilm?
It's pretty rare for anyone to keep an entire issue of a newspaper for 40 years. Hence it's not impluasible that no hardcopy exists any more.
It can still be authenticated or falsified, though. When I did a World Catalogue search a couple years back, I found several libraries around the country that had microfilm copies of that issue. Furthermore, simce World Cat doesn't cover every library in the US, it's likely a few more more have it. All it would take is one microfilm without the announcement to prove the one in the Honlulu library was tampered with. And yet, after 3 years, no birther has managed to find one.
Why do you suppose that is? Or are you seriously suggesting someone traveled to every single library around the country that happens to have that issue to doctor the microfilm?
What am I saying? Nothing.... nothing you will ever know about, at least not now, troll. Nice try to cover up. tick tock
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.