Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Documents show marriage of Obama's parents a sham
WND ^ | June 06, 2011 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 06/06/2011 6:28:18 PM PDT by RobinMasters

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-324 next last
To: DiogenesLamp
No. Any theory that has one going without the other is simply too ridiculous to even consider. Actually, the theory that either or both went is too ridiculous to consider. (Cost too much for people who didn't have the money.)

I agree. So now that you accept they did not travel to Kenya in 1961, what's your basis for doubting Obama Jr. was born in Hawaii?

181 posted on 06/07/2011 3:47:59 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
The Evidence is against you. Look at Barack Sr.'s Immigration file. He GOT deported because they didn't believe he was really married to an American.

I don't believe you. Link please.

182 posted on 06/07/2011 3:49:27 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
This is a lie. Please stop posting lies to FreeRepubic.com.

Check your facts before accusing someone of lying:

http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=71462e6edb79c23595f73fe38&id=9d8904b9d5

183 posted on 06/07/2011 3:55:32 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Try to keep up. That was the online scan of the short-form COLB.

Dude, as an Obama employee, this may be YOUR full time job, but I can only do this stuff in my spare time. Even so, I routinely get the better of you.

They have have EXPLICITLY verified that the long-form Obama recently released came from the state and is a true copy of the original:

"http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=71462e6edb79c23595f73fe38&id=9d8904b9d5"

Dude, I hate to Embarrass you like this, but your link only says that Hawaii gave *HIM* a "certified" copy. It doesn't say that he showed *US* a certified copy. Given what a Liar he is, it should shock no one that what he got from Hawaii isn't what he posted online as an Image file.

Hawaii didn't give HIM an image file. They gave HIM a paper document. Whatever he has posted online is NOT a paper document. It is some sort of screwed up image file. Hawaii most certainly did NOT certify that screwed up Image file, and we only have Obama's word (worth nothing) that what he posted even RESEMBLES what Hawaii gave his lawyer.

184 posted on 06/07/2011 3:55:32 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Those arguing that diluted loyalty is acceptable need to be disabused of that notion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The timeline for his mom ‘Stanley’ and Malcolm X is as hazy as everythign else about his backgound

They did meet, but people say it was a couple of months too far apart to meet his birthday.

They did? Where's the evidence? Do you mean they could have met?

I'm not even sure that's true, but if you've got evidence that they did meet you could get a lot for it.

185 posted on 06/07/2011 3:57:50 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Hawaii didn't give HIM an image file. They gave HIM a paper document. Whatever he has posted online is NOT a paper document

How the hell is he supposed to post a paper document online? Are you really too stupid to understand that any paper document must first be scanned and converted into an image file before being posted?

As the the paper document, he showed a physical copy to reporters, who attested to the fact that it is signed, sealed and certified.

186 posted on 06/07/2011 3:58:18 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Prove this. Link please. [that Stanely Ann started classes in September 1961, not August]

Here you go:

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/08/22/confirmed-stanley-ann-dunham-began-studies-in-september-1961-not-august/

187 posted on 06/07/2011 4:04:56 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Doesn't matter. So long as the state certifies that the contents therein are true, then it constitutes despositive evidence.

The State does NOT certify that the contents are true. At BEST the state certifies that it COULD BE a copy of their record. They don't even certify that their RECORD is true. That's the problem. No one is certifying that ANYTHING is a "true and correct copy of the Original record." You may buy this con-man like dodging, but no one else does.

No one cares what an Amended record says.

If it were amended, it would say it is amended. But it doesn't say that, so we can conclude it's not amended.

Funny, MINE doesn't say it's amended, and I know full well that it's Amended. (I have a copy of My original, and so does my sister who was ALSO adopted.) Why would Obama's certificate say that it's Amended? The whole Idea of AMENDING a birth certificate is to NOT LET ANYONE KNOW that the child wasn't really born to those parents.

We can conclude NOTHING about an Image file from the Obama White House. We do not KNOW that it is a copy of What Hawaii sent him, and even if it were, we don't Know that Hawaii even produced an ORIGINAL record. An Amended certificate just regurgitates the lies that were put upon it when it was created by a Judge.

Let me get you in front of a Jury and I will turn you into a stammering fool.

188 posted on 06/07/2011 4:06:48 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Those arguing that diluted loyalty is acceptable need to be disabused of that notion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
First of all, there's a record of a divorce. Why would a couple bother getting divorced if they weren't married in the first place? Are you seriously going to claim a court would grant a divorce for a couple that couldn't prove they were married?

Common law marriage. Identifying someone as your Husband enough times may constitute a common law marriage. (It is known that Stanley repeatedly identified herself as Mrs. Barack Obama.) Also, A divorce allows a birth certificate to be amended. Funny thing is, the Hawaiian divorce records for Stanley Ann Obama list 14 documents. They will only release 13 of those documents. That 14th document they refuse to release. It is likely the Judge's order Amending Barry's birth certificate.

Perhaps someday you may learn enough about the law to understand this stuff.

Second of all, who cares whether he's a bastard? Why would anyone bother trying to cover that up? Hello: it's the year 2011, not 1011.

Barry cares. It would make him an inferior person in his own mind. So would a LOT of voters. The Stigma of being an unwanted illegitimate wouldn't go over so well with the voters, even today.

189 posted on 06/07/2011 4:15:19 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Those arguing that diluted loyalty is acceptable need to be disabused of that notion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
I don't believe you. Please cite the relevant paragraphs.

"That it is not an absolute is demonstrated by the fact that even Fourteenth Amendment citizenship by naturalization, when unlawfully procured, may be set aside."

http://supreme.justia.com/us/401/815/case.html

All I had time to find. Research the rest yourself at the link provided. Bye till tomorrow.

190 posted on 06/07/2011 4:20:18 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Those arguing that diluted loyalty is acceptable need to be disabused of that notion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Axiomatic. Why would Stanley go without Barack?

Just because you are intellectually bankrupt doesn’t mean there wasn’t a reason for a confused and irrational communist to travel to Kenya alone.

191 posted on 06/07/2011 4:55:09 PM PDT by fastkelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Texas Fossil

Permutations of possibilities are plentiful.


192 posted on 06/07/2011 5:01:07 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

There is nothing there saying that the material posted to www.whitehouse.gov is legit.

Please stop posting lies.


193 posted on 06/07/2011 5:10:57 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
"The fact that they got divorced proves they were married."

PROVES? Not really. A legally filed marriage certificate would prove that.

Fake 'divorces' are a common method to 'create' facts that did not happen. A common illegal immigrant move.

Obama senior obviously claimed a marriage in August 1961 in his INS form. But he did not claim the child supposedly born only 27 days earlier. Why one and no the other? Why was Obama II denied by his supposed father only 27 days after birth? Odd for a loving father (as portrayed in the fantasy books of Obama). Very odd indeed for a supposedly committed husband and father.

Maybe it was a 'common law' marriage, maybe a 'tribal marriage'. But like the birth certificate, there is no sign of a valid marriage certificate. Maybe someone will photoshop one soon!

194 posted on 06/07/2011 5:14:50 PM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: FARS

Here’s one for you Al,
Frank Marshall Davis, father, and Madelyn Payne Dunham (grandma) mother?????????????? Stanley and Barry were brother and sister.
SJB


195 posted on 06/07/2011 5:15:50 PM PDT by sanjuanbob (Festina Lente)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: FARS
Permutations of possibilities are plentiful.

Yes, little is "known" for certain about him. Most of the records about him are forged or disputed.

Ockham's Razor. Suggests finding an explanation with the smallest number of assumptions to explain an question. That will be difficult with what is known about his past.

196 posted on 06/07/2011 5:20:04 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

SAD’s grandfather may have paid or someone else like Frank. Or travel funds may have been available from some form of scholarship he reportedly had landed.T his is not as difficut an obstacle as you make it out to be.

Who paid the flight to Seattle?


197 posted on 06/07/2011 5:33:28 PM PDT by FARS (Be healthy, happy and thrive,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Or are you going to seriously claim that a couple who were never married would go through the trouble of getting divorced?

Barak Sr went through no trouble at all in getting the divorce. He was 5000 miles away from the courthouse and did not even sign the divorce papers which were allegedly mailed to him.

Please stop posting lies to FreeRepublic.com.

198 posted on 06/07/2011 5:33:46 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: bluecat6
Not really. A legally filed marriage certificate would prove that.

So do you honestly believe a court would grant a divorce without a valid marriage certificate being presented? Come on. This is silly.

Fake 'divorces' are a common method to 'create' facts that did not happen.

Bull.

Why was Obama II denied by his supposed father only 27 days after birth? Odd for a loving father (as portrayed in the fantasy books of Obama). Very odd indeed for a supposedly committed husband and father.

Neither Obama Jr. nor anyone ever claimed Obama Sr. was a committed husband and father. That is most certainly NOT how he's portrayed in Obama Jr.'s books. Obama Sr. was an obvious deadbeat who walked out on his son, and no one denies it.

Maybe it was a 'common law' marriage

The divorce decree specifies a date of marriage, so it obviously could not have been common law. If it were just a non-binding Tribal ceremony there would be no need for a divorce.

199 posted on 06/07/2011 5:43:38 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Plummz
Barak Sr went through no trouble at all in getting the divorce.He was 5000 miles away from the courthouse and did not even sign the divorce papers which were allegedly mailed to him.

No, but Stanely Anne Dunham obviously did. Why would she bother if she hadn't been married in the first place?

200 posted on 06/07/2011 5:45:02 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 321-324 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson