Posted on 06/06/2011 6:28:18 PM PDT by RobinMasters
The recently released immigration file for Barack Obama Sr. indicates the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service had doubts he and Obama's mother were married.
While Ann Dunham may have sought Obama Sr. as her husband and the father of her child, the record suggests the two never lived together as a married couple.
As WND reported, there's no record of Ann Dunham's whereabouts during the last six months of her pregnancy.
Moreover, within weeks of the baby's birth, Dunham left Honolulu with her infant son and traveled to Seattle, where she enrolled in night courses at the University of Washington. She did not return to Honolulu until after Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in September 1962 to attend graduate courses at Harvard.
The INS file shows that Barack Obama Sr. was not faithful to Dunham, even when the two were in Hawaii at the same time.
Instead, the documentation supports the conclusion that Obama Sr. and Dunham took part in a sham marriage that the Kenyan student thought might help him extend his visa and remain in the United States to continue his education.
Economic necessity and his desire to complete his studies as soon as possible forced Obama Sr. to remain in Honolulu during the summer months, both to take summer classes and to work part-time.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
...only years LATER, did he subtract 2 years from his age. Which a forger wouldn’t have known. so would have put 25 on a forged document. (OR, SAD didn’t even know the correct age, of the bigamist she married... ? ...either way... it’s worth an investigation.)
A simpler explanation is that Barack Sr., knowing that the baby was not his, didn't bother showing up for the birth. Either Stanley Ann, or Madelyn filled out the birth certificate application.
At this point, until people are subpoenaed, or more behind the scenes investigation is made public, there is so much of the “story” that is just now known. And much that is “known” is just not so.
And is there any record of her being on Food Stamps or is it hearsay or in his book or statements? Unless there are official records of it, it’s another piece of “up for grabs”!
Time to knock this theory in the head. WND has a newspaper clipping from 1960 showing Barack Obama Sr. working in Hawaii during the summer of 1960, because he couldn't afford to live in Hawaii. How is he going to pay for round trip Airplane tickets for the both of them for the following year?
People, please stop with the Kenya theory.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=308229
Guess you'll have to find out the author's sources (David Remnick).
The evidence is much more indicative of a shotgun marriage that didn't work out than it is a sham marraige.
The Evidence is against you. Look at Barack Sr.'s Immigration file. He GOT deported because they didn't believe he was really married to an American.
Prove this. Link please.
Second of all, there's nothing unusual about a mother taking a one-month old baby on a 6 hour flight. It happens all the time.
Was there Jet Service between Hawaii and Seattle, or was it a prop driven plane? I know that BOAC HAD jets, but I don't know if they used them on the Hawaii-Mainland route. Do you? Also do you know if they would have allowed such a small passenger? If so, please provide a link.
The state of Hawaii says it is authentic. I take their word over Corsi's.
The state of Hawaii (Really just the bureaucrats currently in charge there.) won't certify it as ORIGINAL. No one cares what an Amended record says. The ORIGINAL is the only one that hasn't been tampered with, and they won't certify anything as ORIGINAL.
I would think that for the office of President, we could ignore the childish games of uncooperative bureaucrats. Some State election official (other than Hawaii) should subpoena an ORIGINAL document before allowing him on the ballot, which is legal under Hawaiian law.
Since there is also no record of any Marriage, Barack is still a bastard, despite Democrat attempts to cover up this fact.
The fact that SAD chose to divorce Obama Sr. rather than annul the marriage is indicative that she may not have had grounds for annulment. It is very possible that Obama Sr.'s first "marriage" was just a tribal ceremony that was not legally recognized by the colonial British government, in which case the US government would not have recognized it, either.
Which still makes him a bastard.
You are talking about Wong Kim Ark. Yeah, they got that one wrong. Sometimes all the idiots are on the same side and constitute a Majority.
In any case, we've yet to see that barry actually HAS 14th amendment citizenship. So far Hawaii has produced nothing that they will certify as Original. Till they do that, it leaves the door open for an Amended Document, which cannot prove anything.
Oh, by the way, the Supreme court ruled in Roger v. Bellei that 14th amendment citizenship CAN be taken away. They also ruled that "Natural Born Citizenship" cannot.
Really? They REFUSED to verify the COLB posted online was authentic. I find it strange that Bureaucrats will say that a PDF file is "Authentic" when it is just an image. I would think they could only claim that an actual paper DOCUMENT was authentic.
The IMAGE FILE claims to be either a true copy OR an Abstract of the record on file. (Don't you just love either/or certainty? Obama could be EITHER an American Citizen, OR a British National.)
*I* KNOW what an Amended record is. I have one. My original document is sealed, and the State will not let ANYONE see it without my permission. Of course they won't let anyone see my AMENDED document either, without my permission, but That's an "official" fake anyway.
For the office of President, we should not tolerate petty Privacy laws interfering with Article II compliance. Either Obama produces something which says copy of ORIGINAL document, or he doesn't get on the Ballot.
Who said they both went?
Try to keep up. That was the online scan of the short-form COLB. They have have EXPLICITLY verified that the long-form Obama recently released came from the state and is a true copy of the original:
http://us2.campaign-archive1.com/?u=71462e6edb79c23595f73fe38&id=9d8904b9d5
Doesn't matter. So long as the state certifies that the contents therein are true, then it constitutes despositive evidence.
No one cares what an Amended record says.
If it were amended, it would say it is amended. But it doesn't say that, so we can conclude it's not amended.
Who said they both went?
First of all, there's a record of a divorce. Why would a couple bother getting divorced if they weren't married in the first place? Are you seriously going to claim a court would grant a divorce for a couple that couldn't prove they were married?
Second of all, who cares whether he's a bastard? Why would anyone bother trying to cover that up? Hello: it's the year 2011, not 1011.
I don't believe you. Please cite the relevant paragraphs.
Axiomatic. Why would Stanley go without Barack? If Barack Goes by himself, Stanley didn't give birth in Kenya.
No. Any theory that has one going without the other is simply too ridiculous to even consider. Actually, the theory that either or both went is too ridiculous to consider. (Cost too much for people who didn't have the money.)
Dude, their divorce papers are available online. Just Google them. The fact that they got divorced proves they were married.
Or are you going to seriously claim that a couple who were never married would go through the trouble of getting divorced?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.