Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lbryce

We’ve been off the gold standard for some 40 years. It was a bad decision, but could it be returned without a shock to the economy?


5 posted on 06/05/2011 9:40:39 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Muslims are a people of love, peace, and goodwill, and if you say that they aren't, they'll kill you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

Considering that the economy is heading towards a massive shock if not outright collapse: I would say that there is a greater risk from not going back to the gold standard. At least the storm can be weathered much better by being on the gold standard than not.


6 posted on 06/05/2011 9:46:07 PM PDT by Republic_of_Secession.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Hence the reason why a “new” US dollar will be more than just based on gold—it will add silver, platinum, palladium, copper and nickel, also.


8 posted on 06/05/2011 9:58:00 PM PDT by RayChuang88 (FairTax: America's economic cure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

>> “...but could it be returned without a shock to the economy?” <<

.
What economy? - The current game of musical chairs is spiraling into hell at light speed.


10 posted on 06/05/2011 10:01:43 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Going 'EGYPT' - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson