Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PeaRidge
As a matter of fact, I recall looking at a map of slave populations on the eve of the Civil War, and in 1860, the Nebraska Territory (as in, Kansas-Nebraska) contained two (2) live slaves.
135 posted on 06/05/2011 6:36:20 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies ]


To: lentulusgracchus

As one observer characterized the alleged movement of slaves into the territories, the conflict was about an “imaginary negro in an impossible place”.

Another author wrote: “Though many of them doubted whether slavery would ever take permanent root in Kansas, they feared to yield a legal precedent which could later be used against them. And so they demanded a right which they could not actively use - the legal right to carry slaves where few would or could be taken.”

“The one side fought rancorously for what it was bound to get without fighting; the other, with equal rancor, contended for what in the nature of things it could never use.”

http://dzanime.tripod.com/apush/apush/ramsdell-jaffa.htm

One could make the point that Lincoln and the Republicans started a war over a ficticious issue....a Gulf of Tonkin kind of thing.


137 posted on 06/05/2011 8:42:28 AM PDT by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson