Do people in San Francisco have babies? What a horrible place to raise them.
Why would anyone want to live in CA?
I’m sure these leftscum know they’re offending Christians and Jews. That’s the real goal after all.
But do they know they’re crossing muslims? Leftscum are usually too cowardly to do that...
You have got to be kidding. That is absolutely disgusting.
How very tolerant.
Is it subtitled “The Chronicles of the Elders of Zion”? The Progressives really do want to turn back the clock 100 years.
Yet subtle.
Mark
In part it is a matter of sexual perversion. Sodomites look forward to a crop of uncircumcised boys.
“Defenders of the measure say it’s all about “human rights” and “protecting babies” from unnecessary procedures.”
Regardless of your position on abortion anyone that can make this statement and support abortion is a first class hypocrite at the least. It is all about control, it has nothing to do with anything else.
Ummm, it’s pretty much a tradition with Christians as well, harkening back to the Jewish roots of Christianity.
Still awaiting the glorious day SanFran slips into the Pacific. Wash that whole piece of ground clean.
There is or was a doctor in the SF Bay Area that had (may still have) a radio show, Dr. Dean Adel (sp)who was a big pusher of this. Seems like every month he would go off on a rant, looks like he has enough turned to make it real.
Disease prevention? Circumcision does nothing to protect against herpes, hpv or numerous other STDs. Only in the most extreme genetic cases do we preemptively remove breast tissue to prevent cancer.
Hygiene? The human race survived and thrived with foreskins for millennia without the tools of modern hygiene. We don't remove toenails at birth to prevent fungal infections, why cut genitalia?
The practice is sexist. Why are all forms of female circumcision/genital mutilation prohibited but not male varieties?
Finally, and this is one that irritates me the most, it treats male children as property. It fundamentally violates unalienable human rights of the individual. How is a person pro-life, attesting to the distinct individual in the womb, and supportive of unnecessary circumcision of the newborn? The disconnect is shocking.
I'm not particularly moved by the religious practice argument. We're dealing with separate and defenseless persons who can later in life choose, of their own free will, to obtain a circumcision.
In the United States we have limits on parent's religious practice when it jeopardizes a child's safety: snake handlers, faith healers, ritual sacrifice and so forth. A ban on medically unnecessary male circumcision seems like it would be in keeping with those principles.
It's unfortunate the debate has degenerated into accusations of anti-Semitism. Charges of racism are frequently leveled when people would rather silence debate rather than confront issues on the merits.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Usingn ping list a couple weeks old this am. Apologies to anyone left off
The Jewish enemies across 5000 years couldn´t stop it. Neither will the San Franciscans.
Saw this thing, read about the guy( author, mover of the movement). I do not see how this can be anything BUT anti-semetic. Not even “politically correct.” Gads I live well North of SF and thank God the prevailing winds blaow the opposite direction because I don’t want to smell the sulfur when God slams that sh***le with the same stuff the cities of Sodomy Francisco and Gonorrhea(sp? :p) back in the day.