West Point didn't take action lightly, they may have seen the video themselves.
As for the lawsuit, I'm sure he sees a "payday" here.
The thug "bodyguard" came up, thumped his chest against the victim and "got in his face". Gee, where have we heard THAT before?
Then after the three of him caused the injury and the other two walked away, here is the guy lying on the pavement in a concussed state while the guy straddles him. What do your eyes tell you the "bodyguard" is doing here?
This wasn't a snapshot in a second, the guy stood there for at least ten seconds in skip action video on the surveillance video (which means it was even longer) jawing at him.
Is this just your opinion....or did you talk to West Point or are your suppositions more important than the video?