To: LostInBayport
I also don't understand why West Point is taking action against King when charges were not filed! Me neither! If he was convicted of public intoxication or assault, that would be grounds for dismissal. But it's pretty clear that the cadet got jumped virtually from behind while he was engaged in a phone call. Then he was driven into a cement stanchion and knocked unconcious.
What I would like to know is who at West Point did the "investigating"? Did they see this video tape? Lastly, what criteria are they using for dismissal these days?
Seems grossly unjust to take a cadet who is slated to graduate this year with an officer's commission over an event that was beyond his control.
29 posted on
06/03/2011 3:41:14 PM PDT by
Tallguy
(Received a fine from the NFL for a helmet-to-helmet hit.)
To: Tallguy; grundle
What I would like to know is who at West Point did the "investigating"? Did they see this video tape?
I'm thinking West Point made their decision before the lawyer got the video tape. Now that King has a lawyer, I hope they are looking at a way to appeal West Point's decision. Show them the video and then have them read the limo driver's complaint again. The two don't match up.
43 posted on
06/03/2011 3:59:54 PM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson