Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Captain Kirk
I'll bet that not a single person ever challenged Arthur on this issue (e.g. his father's citizenship status) from 1880 (when he ran for veep) to 1885 when he left office?

How do you intend to prove that?

Are you advocating that there should be no two citizen parent requirement for eligibility? If so, why?

15 posted on 06/03/2011 9:24:28 AM PDT by buccaneer81 (ECOMCON)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: buccaneer81

I have the Arthur precedent and I also have a nineteenth century SC ruling on my side, the Kim Wong Ark case. The burden of proof is on you, not me.


18 posted on 06/03/2011 9:30:35 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: buccaneer81
How do you intend to prove that?

Well...nobody (INCLUDING ARTHUR'S BIOGRAPHERS AND YOU) has presented evidence to the contrary for your conspiracy theory. If you want to smear President Arthur's reputation, the burden of proof is on you not me.

19 posted on 06/03/2011 9:33:00 AM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson