Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kearnyirish2

They’re not serfs unless they’re legally tied to the land, unable to leave and ply their trades elsewhere. And to whomever happens to be the lord of the land at that time. Make no mistake, serfdom is slavery. It’s not chattel slavery, it’s not indentured servitude, but it’s a kind all its own I suppose.

Not that you wouldn’t know all that already, mate.


85 posted on 06/03/2011 3:05:59 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Nuts; A house divided against itself cannot stand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: ichabod1

They were better off than Africans in many other colonies, but the fact remains that most of the land was in white hands. I’m not justifying the white colony or the black resistance to it; it is irrelevant to me. I just don’t hink blacks revolted because they were tired of being treated so darn well...


103 posted on 06/03/2011 4:05:46 PM PDT by kearnyirish2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson